‘First generation’ care ethics scholar texts

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. University of California Press
  • Spretnak, C. (1997). Radical nonduality in ecofeminist philosophy. In K. Warren (Ed.), Ecofeminism. Women, culture, nature (pp. 425–436). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
  • Warren, K. (2000). Ecofeminist philosophy: A Western perspective on what it is and why it matters. Oxford: Rowman & Littefield.

More recent care ethics scholarship

  • Ack, B. L., Daly, C., Everett, Y., Mendoza, J., Mitsos, M., Ack, B. L., … Ochs, R. (2001). The practice of stewardship: Caring for and healing ecosystems and communities. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 12(3–4), 117–141.  
  • Anderson, V., Rabello, R., Wass, R. et al. (2020) Good teaching as care in higher education. Higher Education 79, 1–19
  • Barnett, C., & Land, D. (2007). Geographies of generosity: beyond the ‘moral turn’. Geoforum, 38(6), 1065-1075
  • Care, O., Bernstein, M.J., Chapman, M. et al. Creating leadership collectives for sustainability transformations. Sustain Sci 16, 703–708 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00909-y
  • Conradi, E. (2015). Redoing care: Societal transformation through critical practice. Ethics and Social Welfare, 9(2), 113-129.
  • Cooper, D. (2014) Chapter: Unsettling feminist care ethics through a women’s and trans bathhouse. In Everyday utopias. The conceptual life of promising spaces. USA: Duke University Press pp.100-128  
  • Faden, R. R., Kass, N. E., Goodman, S. N., Pronovost, P., Tunis, S., & Beauchamp, T. L. (2013). An ethics framework for a learning health care system: A departure from traditional research ethics and clinical ethics. Ethical Oversight of Learning Health Care Systems, Hasting Center Report Special Report, 43(1), S16–S27.
  • Goerisch, D., Basiliere, J., Rosener, A., McKee, K., Hunt, J., and Parker, T.M. (2019) Mentoring with: reimagining mentoring across the university, Gender, Place and Culture, V26:12, 1740–1758
  • Harcourt, W. (2019). Feminist political ecology practices of worlding: Art, commoning and the politics of hope in the classroom. International Journal of the Commons, 13(1).
  • Held, V. 2002. Care and the extension of markets. Hypatia 17(2): 19-33.
    https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.wur.nl/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2002.tb00763.x
  • Houtbeckers, E. (2021) ‘Feminism(s) and Degrowth Alliance: Pandemic as an opening for a care-full radical transformation’ /March 19, 2021 [Blog Post] https://www.suchresearch.net/blog/2021/3/19/feminisms-and-degrowth-alliance-pandemic-as-an-opening-for-a-care-full-radical-transformation
  • Kemp, C. L., Ball, M. M., & Perkins, M. M. (2013). Convoys of care: Theorizing intersections of formal and informal care. Journal of aging studies, 27(1), 15-29.
  • Koggel, C., & Orme, J. (2010). Care ethics: New theories and applications. Ethics and Social Welfare, 4(2), 109–114.  
  • Mol, A., Moser, I., & Pols, J. (2010). Care: Putting practice into theory. In A. Mol, I. Moser, & J. Pols (Eds.), Care in practice. On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms (pp. 7–27). Bielefeld, DE: Transcript-Verlag.
  • Mountz, A., Bonds, A., Mansfield, B., Loyd, J., Hyndman, J., Walton-Roberts, M., Basu, R., Whitson, R., Hawkins, R., Hamilton, T. and Curran, W., (2015) For slow scholarship: A feminist politics of resistance through collective action in the neoliberal university. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 14(4), pp.1235-1259
  • Pope Francis. (2015). Laudato si. On care for our common home. London: Catholic Truth Society.  
  • Pulcini, E. (2010). The responsible subject in the global age. Science and Engineering Ethics, 16(3), 447–461.
  • Pulcini, E. (2009). Care of the world. Fear, responsibility and justice in the global age. Bologna: Springer.
  • Schildberg, C. (2014). A caring and sustainable economy: A concept note from a feminist perspective. International Policy Analysis, 1–13.  
  • Sellberg, M., Cockburn, J., Holden, P., & Lam, D.P.M. (2021) Towards a caring transdisciplinary research practice: navigating science, society and self, Ecosystems and People, 17:1, 292-305, DOI: 10.1080/26395916.2021.1931452
  • Singh, N. M. (2015). Payments for ecosystem services and the gift paradigm: Sharing the burden and joy of environmental care. Ecological Economics, 117, 53–61.
  • Singh, N. (2017). Becoming a commoner: The commons as sites for affective socio-nature encounters and co-becomings. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 17(4), 751–776.
  • Tschakert, P., & St.Clair, A. L. (2013). Condition for transformative change: The role of responsibility, care, and place-making in climate change research. In International Conference “Transformation in a changing climate” (pp. 267–275). Oslo, Norway: University of Oslo.  
  • Wells, B. L., & Gradwell, S. (2001). Gender and resource management: Community supported agriculture as caring-practice. Agriculture and Human Valus, 18(1), 107–119.  
  • West, S., Haider, L.J., Stålhammar, S., & Woroniecki, S. (2020) A relational turn for sustainability science? Relational thinking, leverage points and transformations, Ecosystems and People, 16:1, 304-325, DOI: 10.1080/26395916.2020.1814417
  • Whyte, K. P., & Cuomo, C. (2016). Ethics of caring in environmental ethics: Indigenous and feminist philosophies. In S. M. Gardiner & A. Thompson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Ethics UK: Oxford University Press

Sustainability and the more-than-human

  • Braidotti, R. (2006) Chapter 3: Transplants: Transposing Nature in Transpositions: on Nomadic Ethics UK: Polity Press: pp. 96-143
  • Du Plessis, C., & Brandon, P. (2015). An ecological worldview as basis for a regenerative sustainability paradigm for the built environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 53–61.
  • Harmin, M., Barrett, M. J., & Hoessler, C. (2017). Stretching the boundaries of transformative sustainability learning: On the importance of decolonizing ways of knowing and relations with the more-than-human. Environmental Education Research, 23(10), 1489–1500.  
  • Kimmerer, R. (2014). Returning the gift. Minding Nature, 7(2), 18–24. Retrieved from https://www.humansandnature.org/filebin/pdf/minding_nature/May2014_Returning_the_Gift.pdf
  • McCoy et al 2020. Restoring indigenous systems of relationality . Blog post: https://www.humansandnature.org/restoring-indigenous-systems-of-relationality?fbclid=IwAR3Q5BaZibON9D5D4gDANIAKrEcnb9dlo55wAy1EVcv3xtXCEr1vr6ciX-g  
  • Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2010). Ethical doings in naturecultures. Ethics, Place & Environment, 13(2), 151–169.
  • Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2011). Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science, 41(1), 85–106.
  • Robinson, J., & Cole, R. J. (2015). Theoretical underpinnings of regenerative sustainability. Building Research and Information, 43(2), 133–143.
  • Wals, A.E.J. (2017) Sustainability by Default: Co-creating Care and Relationality Through Early Childhood Education. IJEC 49, 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-017-0193-5

Justice / Power

  • Avelino 2021. Theories of power and social change. Power contestations and their implications for research on social change and innovation https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2158379X.2021.1875307 [Open access]
  • Brandt, F., Josefsson, J., & Spierenburg, M. (2018) Power and politics in stakeholder engagement. Ecology and Society, 23(3). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26799154  
  • Fricker 2007 Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
  • Haller, T., Acciaioli, G. & Rist, S. (2016) Constitutionality: Conditions for Crafting Local Ownership of Institution-Building Processes, Society & Natural Resources, 29(1), 68-87.
  • Jonsson, S. A. (2011) Virtue and vulnerability: Discourses on women, gender and climate change https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959378011000069  
  • Ruizpalacios, B., Charli-Joseph, L., Eakin, H., Siqueiros-García, J.M., Manuel-Navarrete, D. & Shelton, R. (2019) The Transformation Laboratory of the Social-Ecological System of Xochimilco, Mexico City: Description of the Process and Methodological Guide. Mexico City, Mexico: LANCIS-IE, UNAM. https://steps-centre.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Guide-T-Lab-Xochi-screen-version-English-NA-Hub.pdf
  • Tengö, M., Hill, R., Malmer, P., Raymond, C. M., Spierenburg, M., Danielsen, F., ... & Folke, C. (2017. Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond—lessons learned for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26, 17-25.

Positionality / reflexivity

  • Anderson, C.R. (2020). Confronting the Institutional, Interpersonal and Internalized Challenges of Performing Critical Public Scholarship. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 19(1), 270-302.
  • Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2008). Diverse economies: Performative practices for “other worlds.” Progress in Human Geography, 32(5), 613–632.
  • Jonsson, S.A. (2016) Does resilience have a culture? Ecocultures and the politics of knowledge production
  • Macintyre, T.K.J. (2020) The transgressive gardener: Cultivating learning-based transformations towards regenerative futures, PhD thesis, Wageningen University.  https://edepot.wur.nl/505808

Emotions and/or values in research

  • Barnes, M. (2008). Passionate participation: Emotional experiences and expressions in deliberative forums. Critical Social Policy, 28(4), 461–481.
  • Goralnik, L., & Nelson, M. P. (2017). Field philosophy: Environmental learning and moral development in Isle Royale National Park. Environmental Education Research, 23(5), 687–707.
  • Horlings, L. G. (2015). The inner dimension of sustainability: Personal and cultural values. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 163–169
  • Hubbard, G., Backett-Milburn, K., & Kemmer, D. (2001). Working with emotion: Issues for the researcher in fieldwork and teamwork. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 4(2), 119–137.
  • Kaufman, P. (2017). Critical contemplative pedagogy. Radical Pedagogy, 14(1), 1–20.
  • Laybats, C., & Tredinnick, L. (2016). Post-truth, information, and emotion. Business Information Review, 33(4), 204–206.  
  • Leys, R. (2011). The turn to affect: A critique. Critical Inquiry, 37, 434–472.
  • Moore, K. D. (2017). Great tide rising: Towards clarity and courage in a time of planetary change. Berkeley: Counterpoint Press.  
  • Tschakert, P., Tuana, N., Westskog, H., Koelle, B., & Afrika, A. (2016). TCHANGE: The role of values and visioning in transformation science. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 20, 21–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.04.003

Co-creation, co-production, and transformative research  

Participatory, community and action-oriented and engaged work

  • Blackstock, K. L., Kelly, G., & Horsey, B. (2007). Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability. Ecological Economics, 60(4), 726-742.
  • Chambers, R. (2002) Participatory workshops: A sourcebook of 21 sets of ideas and activities. Earthscan.  
  • Christopher, S., Watts, V., McCormick, A.K.H.G. & Young, S. (2008) Building and maintaining trust in a community-based participatory research partnership. American Journal of Public Health, 98(8), 1398-1406.
  • Cvitanovic, C., Howden, M., Colvin, R. M., Norström, A., Meadow, A. M., & Addison, P. F. E. (2019). Maximising the benefits of participatory climate adaptation research by understanding and managing the associated challenges and risks. Environmental Science & Policy, 94, 20-31.  
  • Doberneck, C., Glass, R. and Schweitzer, J (2010) From rhetoric to reality: a typology of publicly engaged scholarship Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, V14, N4, p. 5, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ910047.pdf  
  • Glass, C & Fitzgerald Engaged scholarship: Historical roots, contemporary challenges. Handbook on engaged scholarship: Contemporary landscapes, future directions Vol 1: Institutional change (pp.9-24) Publisher: Michigan State University Press
  • Kesby, M. (2000) Participatory diagramming: deploying qualitative methods through an action research epistemology. Area, 32(4), 423-435.  
  • Leavy, P. (2017) Community-based participatory research design, in Research Design, New York: Guilford Press, pp. 224-254.
  • Marzi, S. (2020) Conducting transnational participatory research with women during Covid-19 remotely: an impossibility? London School of Economics. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/internationaldevelopment/2020/05/22/conducting-transnational-participatory-research-with-women-during-covid-19-remotely-an-impossibility  
  • Moriggi, A. (2019). Exploring enabling resources for place-based social entrepreneurship. A participatory study of Green Care practices in Finland. Sustainability Science, 15(2), 437–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00738-0
  • Quinn and de Vrieze (2019). Creating sustainable places together. A quick start guide. SUSPLACE: https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/fulltext/494918
  • Small and uttal. 2005. Action‐Oriented Research: Strategies for Engaged Scholarship  
  • Wittmayer and Schapke 2014: Action, research and participation: roles of researchers in sustainability transitions. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11625-014-0258-4[Open access]

Creative and arts-based research  

  • Bagnoli, A. (2009). Beyond the standard interview: The use of graphic elicitation and arts-based methods. Qualitative Research, 9(5), 547-570.  
  • Brown, K., Eernstman, N., Huke, A. R., & Reding, N. (2017). The drama of resilience: Learning, doing, and sharing for sustainability. Ecology and Society, 22(2).
  • Conrad, D. (2004) Exploring risky youth experiences: Popular theatre as a participatory, performative research method. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 12-25.  
  • Enria, L. (2016). Co-producing knowledge through participatory theatre: reflections on ethnography, empathy and power. Qualitative Research, 16(3), 319-329.  
  • Foster, V. (2016). Collaborative Arts-based research for social justice. New York: Routledge.  
  • Galafassi, D. (2018). The transformative imagination: Re-imagining the world towards sustainability. Stockholm University.  
  • Kindon, S. (2003) Participatory video in geographic research: a feminist practice of looking? Area, 35, 142-153.
  • Merrie, A., Keys, P., Metian, M., & Österblom, H. (2018). Radical ocean futures-scenario development using science fiction prototyping. Futures, 95(October), 22–32.  
  • Midha, G. (2010) Theatre of the Oppressed: A manual for educators. University of Massachusetts-Amherst. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=cie_capstones  
  • Mistry, J., Bignante, E., & Berardi, A. (2016) Why are we doing it? Exploring participant motivations within a participatory video project. Area, 48(4), 412-418.
  • Pauwels, L. (2015) ‘Participatory’ visual research revisited: A critical-constructive assessment of epistemological, methodological and social activist tenets. Ethnography, 16(1), 95-117.
  • Pearson, K. R., Backman, M., Grenni, S., Moriggi, A., Pisters, S., & Vrieze de, A. (2018). Arts-based methods for transformative engagement. A toolkit. SUSPLACE.
  • Seppälä, T., Sarantou, M., Miettinen, S.(2021) Arts-Based Methods for Decolonising Participatory Research. https://www.routledge.com/Arts-Based-Methods-for-Decolonising-Participatory-Research/Seppala-Sarantou-Miettinen/p/book/9780367513276?fbclid=IwAR3ckdq-nnExg7a-5WrIIRnMzz1uKt34hGKPuQwcxGvKu3D1O6R4QEnIZFA#
  • Shaw, J. (2016). Emergent ethics in participatory video: negotiating the inherent tensions as group processes evolve. Area, 48(4), 419-426.