Biodiversity Storytelling

Engagement Method

Purpose

To connect personal narratives with ecological and biodiversity-related themes, using storytelling as a tool for reflection, trust-building, and collective learning. This method makes abstract concepts tangible by grounding them in everyday experiences, particularly through food, memory and cultural identity.

Key Features

Participants:
  • Ideal group size: 6–8 storytellers
  • Plenary discussion can include up to 15 participants
  • Suitable for age 11+, adaptable across cultures and contexts
Estimated Timeframe:
  • ~2 weeks’ notice for storytellers to prepare
  • ~2–3 hours facilitator prep (e.g. factsheets)
  • 2-hour workshop, optionally followed by a shared meal
Budget Level:
  • Low
  • Main costs: facilitator time, refreshments, venue, transport support
Materials Needed:
  • Factsheets or information cards on selected fruits/vegetables
  • Comfortable indoor or outdoor space (weather permitting)
  • Institutionally approved ethical information and consent forms (if collecting data)
  • Optional: food samples, illustrated resources, feedback tools
Skills Required:
  • Group facilitation and inclusive communication
  • Workshop planning and recruitment
  • Research and preparation of ecological/cultural facts
  • Sensitivity to emotional and cultural dynamics
  • Adaptability and ethical awareness
Care-full Resources Logomark

Case Study

Method in Practice

Context of Use

Used in the PLANET4B Austrian case study with a Learning Community of migrant women co-creating a biodiverse urban garden. Participants shared stories about meaningful fruits or vegetables, linking personal memories to biodiversity. The session concluded with a communal meal featuring the foods discussed.

How It Worked

Storytellers prepared personal narratives in advance. During the workshop, stories were shared in small groups, followed by a plenary discussion. Facilitators introduced factsheets to connect stories to nature and culture. The session ended with a shared meal, reinforcing themes of connection and care.

Engagement & Participation

Participants engaged through storytelling, listening and reflection. Facilitators created a safe, inclusive space with co-negotiated group rules. The method encouraged emotional expression, cultural exchange, and mutual respect.

Outcomes & Insights:

  • Strengthened trust and group cohesion
  • Elevated experiential and cultural knowledge
  • Fostered emotional connection to biodiversity
  • Inspired follow-up learning and community action
  • Reframed who is seen as a knowledge-holder

Strengths & Considerations

Strengths:

  • Accessible and low-cost
  • Builds trust and empathy
  • Connects biodiversity to everyday life
  • Validates diverse forms of knowledge
  • Adaptable to many formats and audiences

Considerations:

  • Sensitive topics may arise (e.g. food insecurity, migration)
  • Requires careful facilitation and ethical clarity
  • Some participants may prefer non-verbal storytelling formats
  • Preparation time needed for factsheets and recruitment
  • Group dynamics and emotional safety must be actively supported